2A Raccoon River · District 1
Saydel 1991
-6.5
Final rating
2A #51 of 74
5-4
Record
17.6 for · 13.4 against
+4.1
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-5.9
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-13.2 → -6.5Schedule
Wk 1vs2ACarlisle#31W 18-12
Aug 30 · +15.0fav no cov · under
Wk 2at2AColfax-Mingo#73W 15-12
Sep 6 · -10.5fav no cov · under
Wk 3vs3AJefferson JSPC#31L 0-14
Sep 13 · +14.5fav no cov · under
Wk 4vs3APerry#63W 39-7
Sep 20 · -10.0fav cov · over
Wk 5at2AWaukee#52L 7-17
Sep 27 · +1.5fav cov · under
Wk 6vs2ADallas Center-Grimes#37L 6-18
Oct 4 · +5.5fav cov · under
Wk 7at2AAlleman North Polk#66W 38-6
Oct 11 · -1.5fav cov · over
Wk 8at2AHuxley Ballard#72W 29-8
Oct 18 · -15.0fav cov · under
Wk 9vs3AAdel-DeSoto#48L 6-27
Oct 25 · +7.0fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 30 | vs | 2ACarlisle | #31 / 74 2A | +15.0 | 35.0 | W 18-12 OT | fav no cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 6 | at | 2AColfax-Mingo | #73 / 74 2A | -10.5 | 36.0 | W 15-12 | fav no cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 13 | vs | 3AJefferson JSPC | #31 / 63 3A | +14.5 | 32.5 | L 0-14 | fav no cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 20 | vs | 3APerry | #63 / 63 3A | -10.0 | 34.5 | W 39-7 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 27 | at | 2AWaukee | #52 / 74 2A | +1.5 | 34.0 | L 7-17 | fav cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 4 | vs | 2ADallas Center-Grimes | #37 / 74 2A | +5.5 | 34.5 | L 6-18 | fav cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 11 | at | 2AAlleman North Polk | #66 / 74 2A | -1.5 | 33.0 | W 38-6 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 18 | at | 2AHuxley Ballard | #72 / 74 2A | -15.0 | 37.5 | W 29-8 | fav cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 25 | vs | 3AAdel-DeSoto | #48 / 63 3A | +7.0 | 32.5 | L 6-27 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.