2A Raccoon River · District 1
Dallas Center-Grimes 1991
0.8
Final rating
2A #37 of 74
6-3
Record
23.0 for · 13.2 against
+9.8
Margin / game
0-1
Playoffs
out in round 1
-1.4
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
1 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
6.7 → 0.8Schedule
Wk 2vsARedfield Dexfield#93W 43-7
Sep 6 · -58.5fav no cov · under
Wk 3vs3APerry#63W 25-14
Sep 13 · -24.0fav no cov · over
Wk 4at3AJefferson JSPC#31L 8-25
Sep 20 · +7.0fav cov · under
Wk 5vs3AAdel-DeSoto#48L 19-20
Sep 27 · +5.0fav no cov · over
Wk 6at2ASaydel#51W 18-6
Oct 4 · -5.5fav cov · under
Wk 7vs2AHuxley Ballard#72W 44-8
Oct 11 · -20.5fav cov · over
Wk 8vs2AWaukee#52W 22-10
Oct 18 · -8.5fav cov · under
Wk 9at2AAlleman North Polk#66W 21-10
Oct 25 · -16.0fav no cov · under
POvs2ARoland-Story#15L 7-19
Oct 30 · +10.5fav cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Fri Sep 6 | vs | ARedfield Dexfield | #93 / 93 A | -58.5 | 68.5 | W 43-7 | fav no cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 13 | vs | 3APerry | #63 / 63 3A | -24.0 | 37.5 | W 25-14 | fav no cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 20 | at | 3AJefferson JSPC | #31 / 63 3A | +7.0 | 33.5 | L 8-25 | fav cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 27 | vs | 3AAdel-DeSoto | #48 / 63 3A | +5.0 | 37.5 | L 19-20 | fav no cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 4 | at | 2ASaydel | #51 / 74 2A | -5.5 | 34.5 | W 18-6 | fav cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 11 | vs | 2AHuxley Ballard | #72 / 74 2A | -20.5 | 39.0 | W 44-8 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 18 | vs | 2AWaukee | #52 / 74 2A | -8.5 | 34.5 | W 22-10 | fav cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 25 | at | 2AAlleman North Polk | #66 / 74 2A | -16.0 | 35.5 | W 21-10 | fav no cov · under report |
| PO | Wed Oct 30 | vs | 2ARoland-Story | #15 / 74 2A | +10.5 | 40.5 | L 7-19 | fav cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.