2A District 1 · Raccoon River (all-sports)
Huxley Ballard 1991
-22.2
Final rating
2A #76 of 78
0-9
Record
11.1 for · 33.8 against
-22.7
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-26.1
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-14.1 → -22.2Schedule
Wk 1at3ANevada#47L 28-35
Aug 30 · +23.5fav no cov · over
Wk 2at2AEldora E-NP#16L 0-42
Sep 6 · +22.0fav cov · over
Wk 3vs3AAdel-DeSoto#46L 6-34
Sep 13 · +16.0fav cov · over
Wk 4vs2AWaukee#56L 14-34
Sep 20 · +7.0fav cov · over
Wk 5at2AAlleman North Polk#69L 18-35
Sep 27 · +7.5fav cov · over
Wk 6vs3APerry#63L 18-20
Oct 4 · -7.0fav no cov · under
Wk 7at2ADallas Center-Grimes#41L 8-44
Oct 11 · +20.5fav cov · over
Wk 8vs2ASaydel#55L 8-29
Oct 18 · +14.5fav cov · under
Wk 9at3AJefferson JSPC#31L 0-31
Oct 25 · +34.0fav no cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 30 | at | 3ANevada | #47 / 63 3A | +23.5 | 33.5 | L 28-35 | fav no cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 6 | at | 2AEldora E-NP | #16 / 78 2A | +22.0 | 35.0 | L 0-42 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 13 | vs | 3AAdel-DeSoto | #46 / 63 3A | +16.0 | 37.5 | L 6-34 | fav cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 20 | vs | 2AWaukee | #56 / 78 2A | +7.0 | 37.5 | L 14-34 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 27 | at | 2AAlleman North Polk | #69 / 78 2A | +7.5 | 36.5 | L 18-35 | fav cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 4 | vs | 3APerry | #63 / 63 3A | -7.0 | 43.5 | L 18-20 | fav no cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 11 | at | 2ADallas Center-Grimes | #41 / 78 2A | +20.5 | 40.0 | L 8-44 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 18 | vs | 2ASaydel | #55 / 78 2A | +14.5 | 39.0 | L 8-29 | fav cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 25 | at | 3AJefferson JSPC | #31 / 63 3A | +34.0 | 44.0 | L 0-31 | fav no cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.