2A District 1 · Raccoon River (all-sports)
Waukee 1991
-6.8
Final rating
2A #56 of 78
4-5
Record
15.6 for · 14.0 against
+1.6
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-7.4
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-10.6 → -6.8Schedule
Wk 1vs3ARed Oak#58L 7-14
Aug 30 · +14.5fav no cov · under
Wk 2at2AAudubon#62L 15-30
Sep 6 · +6.0fav cov · over
Wk 3vs2AAlleman North Polk#69W 24-0
Sep 13 · +5.5fav no cov · under
Wk 4at2AHuxley Ballard#76W 34-14
Sep 20 · -7.0fav cov · over
Wk 5vs2ASaydel#55W 17-7
Sep 27 · -2.0fav cov · under
Wk 6at3AAdel-DeSoto#46L 3-12
Oct 4 · +10.0fav no cov · under
Wk 7vs3AJefferson JSPC#31L 10-27
Oct 11 · +14.5fav cov · over
Wk 8at2ADallas Center-Grimes#41L 10-22
Oct 18 · +9.0fav cov · under
Wk 9vs3APerry#63W 20-0
Oct 25 · -15.5fav cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 30 | vs | 3ARed Oak | #58 / 63 3A | +14.5 | 31.5 | L 7-14 | fav no cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 6 | at | 2AAudubon | #62 / 78 2A | +6.0 | 32.5 | L 15-30 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 13 | vs | 2AAlleman North Polk | #69 / 78 2A | +5.5 | 32.5 | W 24-0 | fav no cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 20 | at | 2AHuxley Ballard | #76 / 78 2A | -7.0 | 37.5 | W 34-14 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 27 | vs | 2ASaydel | #55 / 78 2A | -2.0 | 35.5 | W 17-7 | fav cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 4 | at | 3AAdel-DeSoto | #46 / 63 3A | +10.0 | 37.0 | L 3-12 | fav no cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 11 | vs | 3AJefferson JSPC | #31 / 63 3A | +14.5 | 34.0 | L 10-27 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 18 | at | 2ADallas Center-Grimes | #41 / 78 2A | +9.0 | 36.0 | L 10-22 | fav cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 25 | vs | 3APerry | #63 / 63 3A | -15.5 | 36.5 | W 20-0 | fav cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.