2A Corn Bowl · District 1
Rockford 1981
-5.0
Final rating
2A #74 of 110
2-7
Record
13.4 for · 20.1 against
-6.7
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-1.8
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-0.5 → -5.0Schedule
Wk 1at2ABritt#22L 22-38
Sep 4 · -7.0fav no cov · over
Wk 2vs1AGreene#21L 0-23
Sep 11 · +9.0fav cov · under
Wk 3at1ANora Springs NS-RF#63L 6-12
Sep 18 · -6.5fav no cov · under
Wk 4vs2ASaint Ansgar#24L 0-21
Sep 25 · +16.0fav cov · under
Wk 5at2ARiceville#42L 6-13
Oct 2 · +13.5fav no cov · under
Wk 6vs2ANashua#58L 16-18
Oct 9 · +6.5fav no cov · over
Wk 7at1AManly North Central#140W 27-6
Oct 16 · -11.0fav cov · over
Wk 8vs1ARockwell-Swaledale#167W 30-14
Oct 23 · -23.5fav no cov · over
Wk 9vs3AHampton#44L 14-36
Oct 31 · +16.5fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 4 | at | 2ABritt | #22 / 110 2A | -7.0 | 32.5 | L 22-38 | fav no cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 11 | vs | 1AGreene | #21 / 193 1A | +9.0 | 35.0 | L 0-23 | fav cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 18 | at | 1ANora Springs NS-RF | #63 / 193 1A | -6.5 | 33.0 | L 6-12 OT | fav no cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 25 | vs | 2ASaint Ansgar | #24 / 110 2A | +16.0 | 31.5 | L 0-21 | fav cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Oct 2 | at | 2ARiceville | #42 / 110 2A | +13.5 | 29.5 | L 6-13 | fav no cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 9 | vs | 2ANashua | #58 / 110 2A | +6.5 | 31.0 | L 16-18 | fav no cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 16 | at | 1AManly North Central | #140 / 193 1A | -11.0 | 29.5 | W 27-6 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 23 | vs | 1ARockwell-Swaledale | #167 / 193 1A | -23.5 | 33.5 | W 30-14 | fav no cov · over report |
| 9 | Sat Oct 31 | vs | 3AHampton | #44 / 89 3A | +16.5 | 36.0 | L 14-36 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.