2A North Iowa Cedar · District 1
LaPorte City 1979
-13.4
Final rating
2A #127 of 168
3-6
Record
8.2 for · 20.7 against
-12.4
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-9.6
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-19.2 → -13.4Schedule
Wk 1at2ADysart-Geneseo#152W 8-7
Sep 7 · +8.5fav no cov · under
Wk 2at2AAckley-Geneva#50L 0-26
Sep 14 · +26.5fav no cov · under
Wk 3vs2AGrundy Center#23L 6-35
Sep 21 · +26.0fav cov · over
Wk 4at2ACedar Falls NU#72L 6-22
Sep 28 · +22.0fav no cov · under
Wk 5vs2AEldora#67L 0-22
Oct 5 · +21.0fav cov · under
Wk 6vs1ADike#66W 14-7
Oct 12 · +6.5fav no cov · under
Wk 7vs2AHudson#10L 0-35
Oct 19 · +34.5fav cov · under
Wk 8at2ATraer North Tama#51L 12-20
Oct 26 · +26.0fav no cov · under
Wk 9vs3AJesup#80W 28-12
Nov 2 · +6.5fav no cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 7 | at | 2ADysart-Geneseo | #152 / 168 2A | +8.5 | 35.0 | W 8-7 | fav no cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 14 | at | 2AAckley-Geneva | #50 / 168 2A | +26.5 | 36.5 | L 0-26 | fav no cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 21 | vs | 2AGrundy Center | #23 / 168 2A | +26.0 | 36.0 | L 6-35 | fav cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 28 | at | 2ACedar Falls NU | #72 / 168 2A | +22.0 | 32.5 | L 6-22 | fav no cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Oct 5 | vs | 2AEldora | #67 / 168 2A | +21.0 | 33.0 | L 0-22 | fav cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 12 | vs | 1ADike | #66 / 147 1A | +6.5 | 29.0 | W 14-7 | fav no cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 19 | vs | 2AHudson | #10 / 168 2A | +34.5 | 44.5 | L 0-35 | fav cov · under report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 26 | at | 2ATraer North Tama | #51 / 168 2A | +26.0 | 36.0 | L 12-20 | fav no cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Nov 2 | vs | 3AJesup | #80 / 82 3A | +6.5 | 32.0 | W 28-12 | fav no cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.