8 Western Valley · District 1
Kingsley-Pierson 2012
0.2
Final rating
8 #33 of 67
3-6
Record
26.4 for · 37.9 against
-11.4
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
4.0
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
21.1 → 0.2Schedule
Wk 1at8Laurens-Marathon#16L 22-24
Aug 24 · -12.0fav no cov · under
Wk 2vs8Newell-Fonda#1L 16-69
Aug 31 · +13.0fav cov · over
Wk 3at8River Valley#36L 33-56
Sep 7 · -15.5fav no cov · over
Wk 4vs8Clay Central-Everly#63W 47-14
Sep 14 · -45.0fav no cov · under
Wk 5vs8Whiting#60W 64-8
Sep 21 · -33.5fav cov · over
Wk 6at8Remsen St Mary#42W 42-18
Sep 28 · -16.0fav cov · under
Wk 7at8Remsen-Union#13L 14-51
Oct 5 · +9.5fav cov · over
Wk 8vs8Harris-Lake Park#11L 0-48
Oct 12 · +12.0fav cov · under
Wk 9at8Marcus MMC#5L 0-53
Oct 19 · +17.5fav cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 24 | at | 8Laurens-Marathon | #16 / 67 8 | -12.0 | 66.0 | L 22-24 | fav no cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Aug 31 | vs | 8Newell-Fonda | #1 / 67 8 | +13.0 | 62.5 | L 16-69 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 7 | at | 8River Valley | #36 / 67 8 | -15.5 | 68.0 | L 33-56 | fav no cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 14 | vs | 8Clay Central-Everly | #63 / 67 8 | -45.0 | 63.0 | W 47-14 | fav no cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 21 | vs | 8Whiting | #60 / 67 8 | -33.5 | 67.0 | W 64-8 | fav cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Sep 28 | at | 8Remsen St Mary | #42 / 67 8 | -16.0 | 68.0 | W 42-18 | fav cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 5 | at | 8Remsen-Union | #13 / 67 8 | +9.5 | 63.5 | L 14-51 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 12 | vs | 8Harris-Lake Park | #11 / 67 8 | +12.0 | 66.5 | L 0-48 | fav cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 19 | at | 8Marcus MMC | #5 / 67 8 | +17.5 | 65.5 | L 0-53 | fav cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.