8 War Eagle · District 1
Remsen St Mary 2012
-10.4
Final rating
8 #42 of 67
3-6
Record
25.0 for · 43.7 against
-18.7
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-2.5
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-3.3 → -10.4Schedule
Wk 1at8Newell-Fonda#1L 6-59
Aug 24 · +32.5fav cov · under
Wk 2vs8Laurens-Marathon#16L 20-50
Aug 31 · +17.0fav cov · over
Wk 3at8Marcus MMC#5L 14-56
Sep 7 · +14.0fav cov · over
Wk 4vs8River Valley#36W 50-44
Sep 14 · +13.5fav no cov · over
Wk 5at8Clay Central-Everly#63W 44-22
Sep 21 · -26.0fav no cov · under
Wk 6vs8Kingsley-Pierson#33L 18-42
Sep 28 · +16.0fav cov · under
Wk 7at8Whiting#60W 48-8
Oct 5 · -20.0fav cov · under
Wk 8vs8Remsen-Union#13L 12-50
Oct 12 · +27.0fav cov · under
Wk 9at8Harris-Lake Park#11L 13-62
Oct 19 · +32.5fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 24 | at | 8Newell-Fonda | #1 / 67 8 | +32.5 | 67.5 | L 6-59 | fav cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Aug 31 | vs | 8Laurens-Marathon | #16 / 67 8 | +17.0 | 66.0 | L 20-50 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 7 | at | 8Marcus MMC | #5 / 67 8 | +14.0 | 65.5 | L 14-56 | fav cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 14 | vs | 8River Valley | #36 / 67 8 | +13.5 | 73.5 | W 50-44 | fav no cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 21 | at | 8Clay Central-Everly | #63 / 67 8 | -26.0 | 66.5 | W 44-22 | fav no cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Sep 28 | vs | 8Kingsley-Pierson | #33 / 67 8 | +16.0 | 68.0 | L 18-42 | fav cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 5 | at | 8Whiting | #60 / 67 8 | -20.0 | 69.0 | W 48-8 | fav cov · under report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 12 | vs | 8Remsen-Union | #13 / 67 8 | +27.0 | 66.0 | L 12-50 | fav cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 19 | at | 8Harris-Lake Park | #11 / 67 8 | +32.5 | 67.5 | L 13-62 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.