A North Star · District 4
Alden 2002
-20.3
Final rating
A #49 of 67
3-6
Record
13.4 for · 26.8 against
-13.3
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-35.1
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-11.5 → -20.3Schedule
Wk 1vsALatimer CAL-Dows#54L 20-31
Aug 30 · -24.5fav no cov · over
Wk 1vsAGreene#25L 6-13
Sep 6 · +14.0fav no cov · under
Wk 2atAHubbard-Radcliffe#3L 0-50
Sep 13 · +31.5fav cov · over
Wk 3vsAClarksville#64W 37-0
Sep 20 · -14.0fav cov · under
Wk 4atALatimer CAL-Dows#54W 12-7
Sep 27 · -9.5fav no cov · under
Wk 5vsANortheast Hamilton#42L 6-25
Oct 4 · +8.0fav cov · under
Wk 6atAAllison-Bristow#59W 32-28
Oct 11 · -14.5fav no cov · over
Wk 8atAGraettinger#13L 8-42
Oct 25 · +28.5fav cov · over
Wk 9atATraer North Tama#5L 0-45
Nov 1 · +39.0fav cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 30 | vs | ALatimer CAL-Dows | #54 / 67 A | -24.5 | 45.0 | L 20-31 | fav no cov · over report |
| 1 | Fri Sep 6 | vs | AGreene | #25 / 67 A | +14.0 | 45.5 | L 6-13 | fav no cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 13 | at | AHubbard-Radcliffe | #3 / 67 A | +31.5 | 42.5 | L 0-50 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 20 | vs | AClarksville | #64 / 67 A | -14.0 | 42.5 | W 37-0 | fav cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 27 | at | ALatimer CAL-Dows | #54 / 67 A | -9.5 | 42.5 | W 12-7 | fav no cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Oct 4 | vs | ANortheast Hamilton | #42 / 67 A | +8.0 | 44.5 | L 6-25 | fav cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 11 | at | AAllison-Bristow | #59 / 67 A | -14.5 | 43.5 | W 32-28 | fav no cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 25 | at | AGraettinger | #13 / 67 A | +28.5 | 38.5 | L 8-42 | fav cov · over report |
| 9 | Fri Nov 1 | at | ATraer North Tama | #5 / 67 A | +39.0 | 49.0 | L 0-45 | fav cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.