A North Star · District 7
Alden 2001
-12.6
Final rating
A #40 of 82
5-4
Record
28.1 for · 20.0 against
+8.1
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-11.3
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-7.3 → -12.6Schedule
Wk 1vsALatimer CAL-Dows#77W 46-6
Aug 31 · -40.5fav no cov · over
Wk 2atAVentura#71W 24-0
Sep 7 · -24.5fav no cov · under
Wk 3atAAllison-Bristow#62W 30-15
Sep 14 · -18.5fav no cov · over
Wk 4vsAHubbard-Radcliffe#3L 6-34
Sep 21 · +20.5fav cov · under
Wk 5atAJanesville#69W 26-8
Sep 28 · -23.0fav no cov · under
Wk 6atANortheast Hamilton#34L 16-33
Oct 5 · +3.5fav cov · over
Wk 7vsAGarwin GMG#54L 27-28
Oct 12 · -11.5fav no cov · over
Wk 8vsALynnville-Sully#31L 20-36
Oct 19 · +5.5fav cov · over
Wk 9atABrooklyn BGM#79W 58-20
Oct 26 · -33.0fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 31 | vs | ALatimer CAL-Dows | #77 / 82 A | -40.5 | 50.5 | W 46-6 | fav no cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 7 | at | AVentura | #71 / 82 A | -24.5 | 42.5 | W 24-0 | fav no cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 14 | at | AAllison-Bristow | #62 / 82 A | -18.5 | 41.5 | W 30-15 | fav no cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 21 | vs | AHubbard-Radcliffe | #3 / 82 A | +20.5 | 48.0 | L 6-34 | fav cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 28 | at | AJanesville | #69 / 82 A | -23.0 | 39.5 | W 26-8 | fav no cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 5 | at | ANortheast Hamilton | #34 / 82 A | +3.5 | 41.5 | L 16-33 | fav cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 12 | vs | AGarwin GMG | #54 / 82 A | -11.5 | 40.5 | L 27-28 | fav no cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 19 | vs | ALynnville-Sully | #31 / 82 A | +5.5 | 42.0 | L 20-36 | fav cov · over report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 26 | at | ABrooklyn BGM | #79 / 82 A | -33.0 | 46.5 | W 58-20 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.