8 North Iowa Cedar · District 5
Ackley AGWSR 2018
4.6
Final rating
8 #27 of 65
6-3
Record
45.4 for · 25.3 against
+20.1
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-4.1
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
5.6 → 4.6Schedule
Wk 1at8Turkey Valley#13L 13-38
Aug 24 · +10.5fav cov · under
Wk 2vs8West Bend-Mallard#10L 19-42
Aug 31 · +3.0fav cov · under
Wk 3at8Collins-Maxwell#53W 43-22
Sep 7 · -38.0fav no cov · over
Wk 4vs8Colo-NESCO#51W 70-36
Sep 14 · -19.0fav cov · over
Wk 5at8Tama Meskwaki#65W 58-0
Sep 21 · -52.0fav cov · under
Wk 6vs8Melcher-Dallas#52W 63-14
Sep 28 · -32.0fav cov · over
Wk 7at8Baxter#50W 69-14
Oct 5 · -24.5fav cov · over
Wk 8vs8Gladbrook-Reinbeck#19L 19-44
Oct 12 · +7.0fav cov · over
Wk 9at8Bussey Twin Cedars#54W 55-18
Oct 19 · -33.0fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 24 | at | 8Turkey Valley | #13 / 65 8 | +10.5 | 68.0 | L 13-38 | fav cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Aug 31 | vs | 8West Bend-Mallard | #10 / 65 8 | +3.0 | 62.0 | L 19-42 | fav cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 7 | at | 8Collins-Maxwell | #53 / 65 8 | -38.0 | 63.5 | W 43-22 | fav no cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 14 | vs | 8Colo-NESCO | #51 / 65 8 | -19.0 | 64.0 | W 70-36 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 21 | at | 8Tama Meskwaki | #65 / 65 8 | -52.0 | 66.5 | W 58-0 | fav cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Sep 28 | vs | 8Melcher-Dallas | #52 / 65 8 | -32.0 | 69.5 | W 63-14 | fav cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 5 | at | 8Baxter | #50 / 65 8 | -24.5 | 71.0 | W 69-14 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 12 | vs | 8Gladbrook-Reinbeck | #19 / 65 8 | +7.0 | 61.5 | L 19-44 | fav cov · over report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 19 | at | 8Bussey Twin Cedars | #54 / 65 8 | -33.0 | 70.5 | W 55-18 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.