1A Eastern Iowa Hawkeye · District 6
West Branch 2006
25.2
Final rating
1A #1 of 64
8-1
Record
35.9 for · 8.9 against
+27.0
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
16.1
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
18.8 → 25.2Schedule
Wk 1at2AWilton#24W 24-0
Sep 1 · -2.0fav cov · under
Wk 2vs2ADurant#21W 35-0
Sep 8 · -18.5fav cov · under
Wk 3at1AMontezuma#7W 15-12
Sep 15 · -20.5fav no cov · under
Wk 4vs1ABrooklyn BGM#47W 43-7
Sep 22 · -31.0fav cov · over
Wk 5vs1AKeosauqua Van Buren#54W 61-6
Sep 29 · -45.0fav cov · over
Wk 6at1AIowa City Regina#9L 21-28
Oct 6 · -5.0fav no cov · over
Wk 7at1AWapello#46W 41-14
Oct 13 · -34.0fav no cov · over
Wk 8vs1APackwood Pekin#24W 34-13
Oct 20 · -19.0fav cov · push
Wk 9at1ABelle Plaine#61W 49-0
Oct 27 · -54.5fav no cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 1 | at | 2AWilton | #24 / 64 2A | -2.0 | 45.5 | W 24-0 | fav cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 8 | vs | 2ADurant | #21 / 64 2A | -18.5 | 42.5 | W 35-0 | fav cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 15 | at | 1AMontezuma | #7 / 64 1A | -20.5 | 37.5 | W 15-12 | fav no cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 22 | vs | 1ABrooklyn BGM | #47 / 64 1A | -31.0 | 42.0 | W 43-7 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 29 | vs | 1AKeosauqua Van Buren | #54 / 64 1A | -45.0 | 55.0 | W 61-6 | fav cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 6 | at | 1AIowa City Regina | #9 / 64 1A | -5.0 | 40.5 | L 21-28 OT | fav no cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 13 | at | 1AWapello | #46 / 64 1A | -34.0 | 44.0 | W 41-14 | fav no cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 20 | vs | 1APackwood Pekin | #24 / 64 1A | -19.0 | 47.0 | W 34-13 | fav cov · push report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 27 | at | 1ABelle Plaine | #61 / 64 1A | -54.5 | 64.5 | W 49-0 | fav no cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.