2A WAMAC · District 4
Waterloo Columbus 2009
-4.9
Final rating
2A #47 of 64
2-7
Record
19.2 for · 31.1 against
-11.9
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-8.9
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-4.2 → -4.9Schedule
Wk 1vs3AIndependence#57W 41-19
Aug 28 · -6.5fav cov · over
Wk 2at2AHudson#18L 16-41
Sep 4 · +16.5fav cov · over
Wk 3at2ANorth Fayette#3L 7-52
Sep 11 · +32.5fav cov · over
Wk 4vs2ADyersville Beckman#28L 31-33
Sep 18 · +10.0fav no cov · over
Wk 5vs2ACascade#17L 23-33
Sep 25 · +16.0fav no cov · over
Wk 6at2AJesup#61W 21-0
Oct 2 · -23.5fav no cov · under
Wk 7vs2AMonticello#32L 14-28
Oct 9 · +7.5fav cov · under
Wk 8at2AMonona MFL-MarMac#52L 20-33
Oct 16 · -9.5fav no cov · over
Wk 9at2ASumnerFredericksburg#10L 0-41
Oct 23 · +26.5fav cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 28 | vs | 3AIndependence | #57 / 64 3A | -6.5 | 45.0 | W 41-19 | fav cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 4 | at | 2AHudson | #18 / 64 2A | +16.5 | 44.5 | L 16-41 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 11 | at | 2ANorth Fayette | #3 / 64 2A | +32.5 | 49.0 | L 7-52 | fav cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 18 | vs | 2ADyersville Beckman | #28 / 64 2A | +10.0 | 44.5 | L 31-33 | fav no cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 25 | vs | 2ACascade | #17 / 64 2A | +16.0 | 48.5 | L 23-33 | fav no cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 2 | at | 2AJesup | #61 / 64 2A | -23.5 | 45.0 | W 21-0 | fav no cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 9 | vs | 2AMonticello | #32 / 64 2A | +7.5 | 46.5 | L 14-28 | fav cov · under report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 16 | at | 2AMonona MFL-MarMac | #52 / 64 2A | -9.5 | 43.5 | L 20-33 | fav no cov · over report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 23 | at | 2ASumnerFredericksburg | #10 / 64 2A | +26.5 | 43.5 | L 0-41 | fav cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.