2A Big East · District 6
Stanwood North Cedar 2000
7.5
Final rating
2A #30 of 72
5-4
Record
19.9 for · 16.7 against
+3.2
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
6.2
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
13.9 → 7.5Schedule
Wk 1at2AWilton#53L 0-6
Sep 1 · -27.0fav no cov · under
Wk 2at2AWellman Mid-Prairie#33W 23-12
Sep 8 · -6.5fav cov · under
Wk 3vs2AMonticello#38L 24-47
Sep 15 · -2.0fav no cov · over
Wk 4at2AAnamosa#51W 13-0
Sep 22 · -17.0fav no cov · under
Wk 5vs2ACamanche#20W 12-0
Sep 29 · +16.0fav no cov · under
Wk 6at2AMount Vernon#7L 9-28
Oct 6 · +20.0fav no cov · under
Wk 7vs2ACenter Point-Urbana#14L 10-39
Oct 13 · +5.5fav cov · over
Wk 8at2AWyoming Midland#69W 54-0
Oct 20 · -32.5fav cov · over
Wk 9vs2ACascade#45W 34-18
Oct 27 · -9.0fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 1 | at | 2AWilton | #53 / 72 2A | -27.0 | 42.5 | L 0-6 | fav no cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 8 | at | 2AWellman Mid-Prairie | #33 / 72 2A | -6.5 | 39.5 | W 23-12 | fav cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 15 | vs | 2AMonticello | #38 / 72 2A | -2.0 | 43.5 | L 24-47 | fav no cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 22 | at | 2AAnamosa | #51 / 72 2A | -17.0 | 40.0 | W 13-0 | fav no cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 29 | vs | 2ACamanche | #20 / 72 2A | +16.0 | 40.0 | W 12-0 | fav no cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 6 | at | 2AMount Vernon | #7 / 72 2A | +20.0 | 40.5 | L 9-28 | fav no cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 13 | vs | 2ACenter Point-Urbana | #14 / 72 2A | +5.5 | 36.0 | L 10-39 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 20 | at | 2AWyoming Midland | #69 / 72 2A | -32.5 | 42.5 | W 54-0 | fav cov · over report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 27 | vs | 2ACascade | #45 / 72 2A | -9.0 | 39.5 | W 34-18 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.