8 Iowa Star · District 2
Northeast Hamilton 2012
-8.5
Final rating
8 #39 of 67
2-7
Record
24.7 for · 41.4 against
-16.8
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-12.5
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
27.4 → -8.5Schedule
Wk 1vs8Ankeny Christian#64W 44-8
Aug 24 · -63.5fav no cov · under
Wk 2at8Colo-NESCO#31L 22-46
Aug 31 · -42.5fav no cov · over
Wk 3vs8West Bend-Mallard#12L 12-52
Sep 7 · +14.5fav cov · under
Wk 4at8Newell-Fonda#1L 0-56
Sep 14 · +29.0fav cov · under
Wk 5vs8Corwith CWL#49L 32-46
Sep 21 · -22.0fav no cov · over
Wk 6at8North Iowa#23L 12-41
Sep 28 · +9.0fav cov · under
Wk 7vs8Laurens-Marathon#16L 16-54
Oct 5 · +16.5fav cov · over
Wk 8vs8Ruthven GTRA#34L 14-64
Oct 12 · -3.0fav no cov · over
Wk 9at8Latimer CAL#66W 70-6
Oct 19 · -38.5fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 24 | vs | 8Ankeny Christian | #64 / 67 8 | -63.5 | 73.5 | W 44-8 | fav no cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Aug 31 | at | 8Colo-NESCO | #31 / 67 8 | -42.5 | 64.0 | L 22-46 | fav no cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 7 | vs | 8West Bend-Mallard | #12 / 67 8 | +14.5 | 65.0 | L 12-52 | fav cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 14 | at | 8Newell-Fonda | #1 / 67 8 | +29.0 | 65.5 | L 0-56 | fav cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 21 | vs | 8Corwith CWL | #49 / 67 8 | -22.0 | 64.5 | L 32-46 | fav no cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Sep 28 | at | 8North Iowa | #23 / 67 8 | +9.0 | 60.5 | L 12-41 | fav cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 5 | vs | 8Laurens-Marathon | #16 / 67 8 | +16.5 | 63.5 | L 16-54 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 12 | vs | 8Ruthven GTRA | #34 / 67 8 | -3.0 | 61.0 | L 14-64 | fav no cov · over report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 19 | at | 8Latimer CAL | #66 / 67 8 | -38.5 | 66.0 | W 70-6 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.