1A Tri-Rivers · District 5
North Linn 2004
-20.5
Final rating
1A #54 of 63
2-7
Record
8.0 for · 31.1 against
-23.1
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-22.1
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-7.8 → -20.5Schedule
Wk 1N1ASaint Ansgar#2L 0-40
Sep 3 · +20.0fav cov · under
Wk 2at2ACascade#54W 46-22
Sep 10 · -1.5fav cov · over
Wk 3vs1ATipton#15L 0-34
Sep 17 · +17.0fav cov · under
Wk 4at1AGuttenberg CR#41L 6-39
Sep 24 · -9.0fav no cov · push
Wk 5at1AArlington Starmont#12L 0-50
Oct 1 · +22.5fav cov · over
Wk 6vs1ABellevue#51L 6-34
Oct 8 · +1.0fav cov · over
Wk 7vs1AStanwood North Cedar#49L 7-19
Oct 15 · +6.0fav cov · under
Wk 8at1AGoose Lake Northeast#10L 0-42
Oct 22 · +34.0fav cov · under
Wk 9at1AWyoming Midland#61W 7-0
Oct 29 · -13.0fav no cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 3 | N | 1ASaint Ansgar | #2 / 63 1A | +20.0 | 42.0 | L 0-40 | fav cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 10 | at | 2ACascade | #54 / 64 2A | -1.5 | 42.5 | W 46-22 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 17 | vs | 1ATipton | #15 / 63 1A | +17.0 | 41.0 | L 0-34 | fav cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 24 | at | 1AGuttenberg CR | #41 / 63 1A | -9.0 | 45.0 | L 6-39 | fav no cov · push report |
| 5 | Fri Oct 1 | at | 1AArlington Starmont | #12 / 63 1A | +22.5 | 43.5 | L 0-50 | fav cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 8 | vs | 1ABellevue | #51 / 63 1A | +1.0 | 39.0 | L 6-34 | fav cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 15 | vs | 1AStanwood North Cedar | #49 / 63 1A | +6.0 | 42.0 | L 7-19 | fav cov · under report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 22 | at | 1AGoose Lake Northeast | #10 / 63 1A | +34.0 | 44.0 | L 0-42 | fav cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 29 | at | 1AWyoming Midland | #61 / 63 1A | -13.0 | 46.0 | W 7-0 | fav no cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.