A North Iowa · District 2
North Iowa 2008
-26.0
Final rating
A #48 of 58
1-8
Record
13.6 for · 40.7 against
-27.1
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-28.8
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-13.8 → -26.0Schedule
Wk 1vsARockford#23L 18-56
Aug 29 · -17.5fav no cov · over
Wk 2at1AGarner-Hayfield#31L 7-48
Sep 5 · +10.5fav cov · over
Wk 3vsANewell-Fonda#20L 7-53
Sep 12 · +32.0fav cov · over
Wk 4atASouthern Cal#1L 6-48
Sep 19 · +43.0fav no cov · over
Wk 5atARockwell City-Lytton#31L 6-34
Sep 26 · +23.5fav cov · under
Wk 6vsABurnside SE Webster#57W 58-0
Oct 3 · -19.0fav cov · over
Wk 7atAAlgona Garrigan#11L 6-42
Oct 10 · +35.0fav cov · over
Wk 8vsAAlta#6L 6-43
Oct 17 · +37.5fav no cov · over
Wk 9vsAClay Central-Everly#19L 8-42
Oct 24 · +23.0fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 29 | vs | ARockford | #23 / 58 A | -17.5 | 42.5 | L 18-56 | fav no cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 5 | at | 1AGarner-Hayfield | #31 / 64 1A | +10.5 | 46.0 | L 7-48 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 12 | vs | ANewell-Fonda | #20 / 58 A | +32.0 | 44.5 | L 7-53 | fav cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 19 | at | ASouthern Cal | #1 / 58 A | +43.0 | 53.0 | L 6-48 | fav no cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 26 | at | ARockwell City-Lytton | #31 / 58 A | +23.5 | 44.0 | L 6-34 | fav cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 3 | vs | ABurnside SE Webster | #57 / 58 A | -19.0 | 51.0 | W 58-0 | fav cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 10 | at | AAlgona Garrigan | #11 / 58 A | +35.0 | 45.0 | L 6-42 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 17 | vs | AAlta | #6 / 58 A | +37.5 | 47.5 | L 6-43 | fav no cov · over report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 24 | vs | AClay Central-Everly | #19 / 58 A | +23.0 | 44.0 | L 8-42 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.