2A Big Bend · District 5
Monticello 2002
13.9
Final rating
2A #19 of 72
6-3
Record
27.4 for · 13.0 against
+14.4
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
15.1
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
9.9 → 13.9Schedule
Wk 1vs1AEdgewood-Colesburg#41W 42-14
Sep 6 · -14.0fav cov · over
Wk 2at2ACascade#54W 34-27
Sep 13 · -4.0fav cov · over
Wk 3vs2ACenter Point-Urbana#23W 21-14
Sep 20 · -9.0fav no cov · under
Wk 4at2AStanwood North Cedar#57W 28-0
Sep 27 · -25.5fav cov · under
Wk 5vs2ACamanche#63W 55-20
Oct 4 · -18.5fav cov · over
Wk 6at2AMaquoketa Valley#17L 14-20
Oct 11 · -2.0fav no cov · under
Wk 7vs2AAnamosa#59W 41-7
Oct 18 · -21.5fav cov · over
Wk 8at2ASolon#9L 6-7
Oct 25 · +11.5fav no cov · under
Wk 9vs2ACascade#54L 6-8
Nov 1 · -23.5fav no cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 6 | vs | 1AEdgewood-Colesburg | #41 / 72 1A | -14.0 | 39.5 | W 42-14 | fav cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 13 | at | 2ACascade | #54 / 72 2A | -4.0 | 42.0 | W 34-27 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 20 | vs | 2ACenter Point-Urbana | #23 / 72 2A | -9.0 | 42.5 | W 21-14 OT | fav no cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 27 | at | 2AStanwood North Cedar | #57 / 72 2A | -25.5 | 45.0 | W 28-0 | fav cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Oct 4 | vs | 2ACamanche | #63 / 72 2A | -18.5 | 42.0 | W 55-20 | fav cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 11 | at | 2AMaquoketa Valley | #17 / 72 2A | -2.0 | 43.5 | L 14-20 | fav no cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 18 | vs | 2AAnamosa | #59 / 72 2A | -21.5 | 42.5 | W 41-7 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 25 | at | 2ASolon | #9 / 72 2A | +11.5 | 42.5 | L 6-7 | fav no cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Nov 1 | vs | 2ACascade | #54 / 72 2A | -23.5 | 42.0 | L 6-8 | fav no cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.