A Maple Valley · District 8
Lawton-Bronson 2005
-2.1
Final rating
A #31 of 77
2-7
Record
17.4 for · 27.3 against
-9.9
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-29.8
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
1.3 → -2.1Schedule
Wk 1atASac City#25L 26-34
Sep 2 · -5.5fav no cov · over
Wk 2vsASloan Westwood#53W 21-12
Sep 9 · -12.0fav no cov · under
Wk 3atAKingsley-Pierson#12L 7-28
Sep 16 · +20.5fav cov · under
Wk 4atAWoodbury Central#27L 21-28
Sep 24 · +1.5fav cov · over
Wk 5vsARiver Valley#52W 36-8
Sep 30 · -7.0fav cov · over
Wk 6atALake View WLVA#17L 13-42
Oct 7 · +4.0fav cov · over
Wk 7vsAGalva-Holstein#4L 8-47
Oct 14 · +34.0fav cov · over
Wk 8atALeMars Gehlen#7L 6-20
Oct 22 · +23.5fav no cov · under
Wk 9vsAOdebolt-Arthur#14L 19-27
Oct 28 · +14.5fav no cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 2 | at | ASac City | #25 / 77 A | -5.5 | 42.0 | L 26-34 | fav no cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 9 | vs | ASloan Westwood | #53 / 77 A | -12.0 | 46.5 | W 21-12 | fav no cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 16 | at | AKingsley-Pierson | #12 / 77 A | +20.5 | 45.0 | L 7-28 | fav cov · under report |
| 4 | Sat Sep 24 | at | AWoodbury Central | #27 / 77 A | +1.5 | 44.5 | L 21-28 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 30 | vs | ARiver Valley | #52 / 77 A | -7.0 | 42.5 | W 36-8 | fav cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 7 | at | ALake View WLVA | #17 / 77 A | +4.0 | 42.0 | L 13-42 | fav cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 14 | vs | AGalva-Holstein | #4 / 77 A | +34.0 | 45.0 | L 8-47 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Sat Oct 22 | at | ALeMars Gehlen | #7 / 77 A | +23.5 | 47.0 | L 6-20 | fav no cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 28 | vs | AOdebolt-Arthur | #14 / 77 A | +14.5 | 41.0 | L 19-27 | fav no cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.