2A Raccoon River · District 1
Huxley Ballard 1988
2.1
Final rating
2A #45 of 81
6-3
Record
21.0 for · 17.4 against
+3.6
Margin / game
0-1
Playoffs
out in round 1
6.2
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
1 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-6.7 → 2.1Schedule
Wk 1vs2ARoland-Story#53W 36-13
Sep 2 · +2.0fav no cov · over
Wk 2at2ADallas Center-Grimes#58W 40-7
Sep 9 · -3.5fav cov · over
Wk 3at2AAudubon#47W 19-8
Sep 16 · -2.5fav cov · under
Wk 4vs2AAlleman North Polk#36W 8-6
Sep 23 · -1.5fav cov · under
Wk 5at2AAdel-DeSoto#43W 30-26
Sep 30 · -3.5fav cov · over
Wk 6vs2AWaukee#50W 28-13
Oct 7 · -5.0fav cov · over
Wk 7at3ANew Hampton#16L 0-21
Oct 14 · +14.5fav cov · under
Wk 8atALatimer CAL-Dows#48L 14-46
Oct 21 · -21.0fav no cov · over
POvs2AAlleman North Polk#36L 14-17
Oct 26 · +2.5fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 2 | vs | 2ARoland-Story | #53 / 81 2A | +2.0 | 32.0 | W 36-13 | fav no cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 9 | at | 2ADallas Center-Grimes | #58 / 81 2A | -3.5 | 33.5 | W 40-7 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 16 | at | 2AAudubon | #47 / 81 2A | -2.5 | 36.0 | W 19-8 | fav cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 23 | vs | 2AAlleman North Polk | #36 / 81 2A | -1.5 | 30.0 | W 8-6 | fav cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 30 | at | 2AAdel-DeSoto | #43 / 81 2A | -3.5 | 35.0 | W 30-26 | fav cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 7 | vs | 2AWaukee | #50 / 81 2A | -5.0 | 32.5 | W 28-13 | fav cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 14 | at | 3ANew Hampton | #16 / 72 3A | +14.5 | 36.5 | L 0-21 | fav cov · under report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 21 | at | ALatimer CAL-Dows | #48 / 89 A | -21.0 | 33.5 | L 14-46 | fav no cov · over report |
| PO | Wed Oct 26 | vs | 2AAlleman North Polk | #36 / 81 2A | +2.5 | 30.5 | L 14-17 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.