2A Upper Iowa · District 5
Guttenberg CR 2001
-9.7
Final rating
2A #58 of 72
4-5
Record
26.9 for · 29.8 against
-2.9
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-5.5
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-8.4 → -9.7Schedule
Wk 1vs1AElkader Central#69W 54-6
Aug 31 · -31.0fav cov · over
Wk 2atAOlin#80W 47-0
Sep 7 · -41.5fav cov · under
Wk 3vs2ADyersville Beckman#9L 26-54
Sep 14 · +13.5fav cov · over
Wk 4vs2AMonona MFL-MarMac#64W 34-20
Sep 21 · -13.5fav cov · over
Wk 5at2AMaquoketa Valley#29L 0-32
Sep 28 · +9.0fav cov · under
Wk 6at2AJesup#53L 20-48
Oct 5 · PKpush · over
Wk 7vs2ANorth Fayette#12L 2-48
Oct 12 · +26.5fav cov · under
Wk 8at2ASouth Winneshiek#56W 26-8
Oct 19 · +5.0fav no cov · under
Wk 9at2AArlington Starmont#42L 33-52
Oct 26 · +11.0fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 31 | vs | 1AElkader Central | #69 / 72 1A | -31.0 | 44.0 | W 54-6 | fav cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 7 | at | AOlin | #80 / 82 A | -41.5 | 51.5 | W 47-0 | fav cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 14 | vs | 2ADyersville Beckman | #9 / 72 2A | +13.5 | 43.0 | L 26-54 | fav cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 21 | vs | 2AMonona MFL-MarMac | #64 / 72 2A | -13.5 | 46.0 | W 34-20 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 28 | at | 2AMaquoketa Valley | #29 / 72 2A | +9.0 | 48.0 | L 0-32 | fav cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 5 | at | 2AJesup | #53 / 72 2A | PK | 44.0 | L 20-48 | push · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 12 | vs | 2ANorth Fayette | #12 / 72 2A | +26.5 | 51.5 | L 2-48 | fav cov · under report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 19 | at | 2ASouth Winneshiek | #56 / 72 2A | +5.0 | 48.5 | W 26-8 | fav no cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 26 | at | 2AArlington Starmont | #42 / 72 2A | +11.0 | 48.5 | L 33-52 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.