8 Rolling Hills · District 7
East Greene 2011
-4.5
Final rating
8 #35 of 59
4-5
Record
35.3 for · 42.2 against
-6.9
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-11.3
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
14.1 → -4.5Schedule
Wk 2at8Melcher-Dallas#34L 30-44
Aug 26 · -28.5fav no cov · over
Wk 3vs8Bussey Twin Cedars#44W 36-34
Sep 3 · -23.0fav no cov · over
Wk 4at8Dunlap Boyer Valley#18L 22-68
Sep 9 · +13.5fav cov · over
Wk 5vs8Charter Oak-Ute#55W 66-28
Sep 16 · -33.0fav cov · over
Wk 6at8Glidden-Ralston#10L 31-78
Sep 23 · +30.0fav cov · over
Wk 7vs8Woodbine#36L 16-41
Sep 30 · -3.5fav no cov · under
Wk 8at8Essex#50W 44-12
Oct 7 · -18.5fav cov · under
Wk 9vs8Coon Rapids-Bayard#27W 39-14
Oct 14 · +14.5fav no cov · under
Wk 10vs8Westside Ar-We-Va#29L 34-61
Oct 21 · +4.0fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Fri Aug 26 | at | 8Melcher-Dallas | #34 / 59 8 | -28.5 | 63.5 | L 30-44 | fav no cov · over report |
| 3 | Sat Sep 3 | vs | 8Bussey Twin Cedars | #44 / 59 8 | -23.0 | 66.0 | W 36-34 | fav no cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 9 | at | 8Dunlap Boyer Valley | #18 / 59 8 | +13.5 | 62.0 | L 22-68 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 16 | vs | 8Charter Oak-Ute | #55 / 59 8 | -33.0 | 68.0 | W 66-28 | fav cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Sep 23 | at | 8Glidden-Ralston | #10 / 59 8 | +30.0 | 65.5 | L 31-78 | fav cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Sep 30 | vs | 8Woodbine | #36 / 59 8 | -3.5 | 64.0 | L 16-41 | fav no cov · under report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 7 | at | 8Essex | #50 / 59 8 | -18.5 | 65.0 | W 44-12 | fav cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 14 | vs | 8Coon Rapids-Bayard | #27 / 59 8 | +14.5 | 65.0 | W 39-14 | fav no cov · under report |
| 10 | Fri Oct 21 | vs | 8Westside Ar-We-Va | #29 / 59 8 | +4.0 | 64.5 | L 34-61 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.