1A Bo-Coon · District 1
Early Crestland 1980
10.3
Final rating
1A #16 of 177
8-1
Record
26.1 for · 1.8 against
+24.3
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
12.6
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-12.2 → 10.3Schedule
Wk 1vs1APomeroy#35W 14-0
Sep 5 · +26.0fav no cov · under
Wk 2at1ANewell-Providence#14W 10-0
Sep 12 · +10.5fav no cov · under
Wk 3vs1ALohrville#48W 12-0
Sep 19 · +4.0fav no cov · under
Wk 4vs2ASioux Rapids SR-R#122W 43-0
Sep 26 · -28.5fav cov · over
Wk 5at1ABattle Creek#124W 36-0
Oct 3 · -16.0fav cov · over
Wk 6vs1ALytton#118W 49-0
Oct 10 · -15.0fav cov · over
Wk 7at1ALake View-Auburn#129W 39-6
Oct 17 · -27.0fav cov · over
Wk 8vs1ASchaller#30W 26-0
Oct 24 · -4.0fav cov · under
Wk 9at1AWall Lake#6L 6-10
Oct 31 · +5.5fav no cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 5 | vs | 1APomeroy | #35 / 177 1A | +26.0 | 36.5 | W 14-0 | fav no cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 12 | at | 1ANewell-Providence | #14 / 177 1A | +10.5 | 32.0 | W 10-0 | fav no cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 19 | vs | 1ALohrville | #48 / 177 1A | +4.0 | 29.5 | W 12-0 | fav no cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 26 | vs | 2ASioux Rapids SR-R | #122 / 126 2A | -28.5 | 38.5 | W 43-0 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Oct 3 | at | 1ABattle Creek | #124 / 177 1A | -16.0 | 30.0 | W 36-0 | fav cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 10 | vs | 1ALytton | #118 / 177 1A | -15.0 | 29.0 | W 49-0 | fav cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 17 | at | 1ALake View-Auburn | #129 / 177 1A | -27.0 | 37.0 | W 39-6 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 24 | vs | 1ASchaller | #30 / 177 1A | -4.0 | 32.0 | W 26-0 | fav cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 31 | at | 1AWall Lake | #6 / 177 1A | +5.5 | 33.0 | L 6-10 | fav no cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.