1A WAMAC · District 5
Dyersville Beckman 2020
-4.0
Final rating
1A #28 of 54
6-3
Record
26.8 for · 22.8 against
+4.0
Margin / game
2-1
Playoffs
out in round 3
-7.5
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
3 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-4.5 → -4.0Schedule
Wk 2vs2AAnamosa#36L 28-42
Sep 4 · -13.5fav no cov · over
Wk 3vs1AGoose Lake Northeast#48W 37-7
Sep 11 · -14.5fav cov · under
Wk 4at1ACascade#19W 28-19
Sep 18 · +7.0fav no cov · under
Wk 5vs1ADurant#26W 24-17
Sep 25 · +5.5fav no cov · under
Wk 6at1AWilton#40W 42-30
Oct 2 · -13.5fav no cov · over
Wk 7vs1AWest Branch#14L 21-35
Oct 9 · +10.5fav cov · over
POvs1AGoose Lake Northeast#48W 28-6
Oct 16 · -29.0fav no cov · under
POvs1ADurant#26W 19-14
Oct 23 · +2.0fav no cov · under
POat1ASigourney-Keota#8L 14-35
Oct 30 · +20.0fav cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | Fri Sep 4 | vs | 2AAnamosa | #36 / 54 2A | -13.5 | 49.5 | L 28-42 | fav no cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 11 | vs | 1AGoose Lake Northeast | #48 / 54 1A | -14.5 | 49.5 | W 37-7 | fav cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 18 | at | 1ACascade | #19 / 54 1A | +7.0 | 51.0 | W 28-19 | fav no cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 25 | vs | 1ADurant | #26 / 54 1A | +5.5 | 49.0 | W 24-17 | fav no cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 2 | at | 1AWilton | #40 / 54 1A | -13.5 | 50.5 | W 42-30 | fav no cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 9 | vs | 1AWest Branch | #14 / 54 1A | +10.5 | 49.0 | L 21-35 | fav cov · over report |
| PO | Fri Oct 16 | vs | 1AGoose Lake Northeast | #48 / 54 1A | -29.0 | 49.5 | W 28-6 | fav no cov · under report |
| PO | Fri Oct 23 | vs | 1ADurant | #26 / 54 1A | +2.0 | 52.0 | W 19-14 | fav no cov · under report |
| PO | Fri Oct 30 | at | 1ASigourney-Keota | #8 / 54 1A | +20.0 | 50.0 | L 14-35 | fav cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.