4A Mississippi Athletic · District 4
Davenport Central 1996
15.8
Final rating
4A #38 of 47
0-9
Record
7.4 for · 32.6 against
-25.1
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-22.2
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
31.4 → 15.8Schedule
Wk 1vs4AMuscatine#30L 6-26
Sep 6 · PKpush · under
Wk 2at4ABurlington#21L 14-48
Sep 13 · +7.5fav cov · over
Wk 3vs4APleasant Valley#3L 0-41
Sep 20 · +15.5fav cov · over
Wk 4at4ADavenport North#32L 8-42
Sep 27 · -2.5fav no cov · over
Wk 5vs4ADavenport West#14L 12-14
Oct 4 · +26.5fav no cov · under
Wk 6at4ADavenport Assumption#4L 14-35
Oct 11 · +30.0fav no cov · over
Wk 7vs4AClinton#15L 0-49
Oct 18 · +16.5fav cov · over
Wk 8at4AEldridge North Scott#13L 7-21
Oct 25 · +26.0fav no cov · under
Wk 9vs4ABettendorf#6L 6-17
Nov 1 · +30.0fav no cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 6 | vs | 4AMuscatine | #30 / 47 4A | PK | 40.0 | L 6-26 | push · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 13 | at | 4ABurlington | #21 / 47 4A | +7.5 | 42.5 | L 14-48 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 20 | vs | 4APleasant Valley | #3 / 47 4A | +15.5 | 38.0 | L 0-41 | fav cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 27 | at | 4ADavenport North | #32 / 47 4A | -2.5 | 42.5 | L 8-42 | fav no cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Oct 4 | vs | 4ADavenport West | #14 / 47 4A | +26.5 | 43.5 | L 12-14 | fav no cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 11 | at | 4ADavenport Assumption | #4 / 47 4A | +30.0 | 40.0 | L 14-35 | fav no cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 18 | vs | 4AClinton | #15 / 47 4A | +16.5 | 39.5 | L 0-49 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 25 | at | 4AEldridge North Scott | #13 / 47 4A | +26.0 | 41.0 | L 7-21 | fav no cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Nov 1 | vs | 4ABettendorf | #6 / 47 4A | +30.0 | 40.0 | L 6-17 | fav no cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.