4A Mississippi Athletic · District 1
Davenport Central 1989
56.2
Final rating
4A #3 of 46
5-4
Record
27.4 for · 13.9 against
+13.6
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
40.1
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
47.8 → 56.2Schedule
Wk 1vs4AMuscatine#22L 20-21
Sep 1 · -9.0fav no cov · over
Wk 2at4ADavenport North#15W 28-6
Sep 8 · -1.0fav cov · under
Wk 3at4ABurlington#5L 20-35
Sep 15 · +10.0fav cov · over
Wk 4vs4APleasant Valley#23W 49-0
Sep 22 · -1.0fav cov · over
Wk 5at4ADavenport Assumption#10L 14-21
Sep 29 · -9.0fav no cov · under
Wk 6at4AClinton#26W 27-7
Oct 6 · -12.0fav cov · push
Wk 7at4ADavenport West#25W 41-7
Oct 13 · -13.5fav cov · over
Wk 8vs4ABettendorf#1L 14-21
Oct 20 · +11.5fav no cov · under
Wk 9at4AEldridge North Scott#27W 34-7
Oct 27 · -18.0fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 1 | vs | 4AMuscatine | #22 / 46 4A | -9.0 | 34.0 | L 20-21 | fav no cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 8 | at | 4ADavenport North | #15 / 46 4A | -1.0 | 35.0 | W 28-6 | fav cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 15 | at | 4ABurlington | #5 / 46 4A | +10.0 | 36.5 | L 20-35 | fav cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 22 | vs | 4APleasant Valley | #23 / 46 4A | -1.0 | 36.0 | W 49-0 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 29 | at | 4ADavenport Assumption | #10 / 46 4A | -9.0 | 36.5 | L 14-21 OT | fav no cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 6 | at | 4AClinton | #26 / 46 4A | -12.0 | 34.0 | W 27-7 | fav cov · push report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 13 | at | 4ADavenport West | #25 / 46 4A | -13.5 | 38.0 | W 41-7 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 20 | vs | 4ABettendorf | #1 / 46 4A | +11.5 | 41.5 | L 14-21 | fav no cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 27 | at | 4AEldridge North Scott | #27 / 46 4A | -18.0 | 35.0 | W 34-7 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.