8 West Central · District 4
Coon Rapids-Bayard 2005
-5.7
Final rating
8 #28 of 47
3-6
Record
23.1 for · 37.7 against
-14.6
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-3.0
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
1.1 → -5.7Schedule
Wk 1at8Granville Spalding#37W 42-12
Sep 2 · -17.5fav cov · under
Wk 2vs8Remsen St Mary#3L 0-48
Sep 9 · +36.5fav cov · under
Wk 3at8Remsen-Union#12L 12-66
Sep 16 · +13.0fav cov · over
Wk 4vs8Aurelia#14L 26-36
Sep 23 · +32.0fav no cov · over
Wk 5vs8Westside Ar-We-Va#17L 8-32
Sep 30 · +14.0fav cov · under
Wk 6at8Exira#36L 20-30
Oct 7 · -24.0fav no cov · under
Wk 7vs8Glidden-Ralston#1L 0-76
Oct 14 · +53.0fav cov · over
Wk 8at8East Greene#44W 56-14
Oct 21 · -15.5fav cov · over
Wk 9vs8Elk Horn-Kimballton#23W 44-25
Oct 28 · +11.5fav no cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 2 | at | 8Granville Spalding | #37 / 47 8 | -17.5 | 58.5 | W 42-12 | fav cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 9 | vs | 8Remsen St Mary | #3 / 47 8 | +36.5 | 60.0 | L 0-48 | fav cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 16 | at | 8Remsen-Union | #12 / 47 8 | +13.0 | 58.0 | L 12-66 | fav cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 23 | vs | 8Aurelia | #14 / 47 8 | +32.0 | 60.5 | L 26-36 | fav no cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 30 | vs | 8Westside Ar-We-Va | #17 / 47 8 | +14.0 | 61.0 | L 8-32 | fav cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 7 | at | 8Exira | #36 / 47 8 | -24.0 | 59.0 | L 20-30 | fav no cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 14 | vs | 8Glidden-Ralston | #1 / 47 8 | +53.0 | 63.0 | L 0-76 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 21 | at | 8East Greene | #44 / 47 8 | -15.5 | 54.0 | W 56-14 | fav cov · over report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 28 | vs | 8Elk Horn-Kimballton | #23 / 47 8 | +11.5 | 62.0 | W 44-25 | fav no cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.