3A Northeast · District 1
Charles City 1982
28.8
Final rating
3A #10 of 86
6-3
Record
20.3 for · 9.1 against
+11.2
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
32.7
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
21.5 → 28.8Schedule
Wk 1at3AWaterloo Columbus#9L 6-12
Sep 3 · +9.0fav no cov · under
Wk 2vs4AMason City#14L 0-13
Sep 10 · +17.0fav no cov · under
Wk 3vs3AWaukon#56W 21-0
Sep 17 · -8.0fav cov · under
Wk 4at3ADecorah#48W 33-6
Sep 24 · -8.0fav cov · over
Wk 5vs3AOelwein#27W 14-8
Oct 1 · -14.0fav no cov · under
Wk 6at3ACresco Crestwood#11W 22-13
Oct 8 · +8.0fav no cov · over
Wk 7vs3AWaverly-Shell Rock#22L 12-16
Oct 15 · -12.0fav no cov · under
Wk 8at3ANew Hampton#58W 35-0
Oct 22 · -15.0fav cov · over
Wk 9at4AWaterloo Central#38W 40-14
Oct 30 · -4.5fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 3 | at | 3AWaterloo Columbus | #9 / 86 3A | +9.0 | 30.0 | L 6-12 | fav no cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 10 | vs | 4AMason City | #14 / 43 4A | +17.0 | 30.0 | L 0-13 | fav no cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 17 | vs | 3AWaukon | #56 / 86 3A | -8.0 | 29.5 | W 21-0 | fav cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 24 | at | 3ADecorah | #48 / 86 3A | -8.0 | 25.5 | W 33-6 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Oct 1 | vs | 3AOelwein | #27 / 86 3A | -14.0 | 27.0 | W 14-8 | fav no cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 8 | at | 3ACresco Crestwood | #11 / 86 3A | +8.0 | 31.0 | W 22-13 | fav no cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 15 | vs | 3AWaverly-Shell Rock | #22 / 86 3A | -12.0 | 32.5 | L 12-16 | fav no cov · under report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 22 | at | 3ANew Hampton | #58 / 86 3A | -15.0 | 28.5 | W 35-0 | fav cov · over report |
| 9 | Sat Oct 30 | at | 4AWaterloo Central | #38 / 43 4A | -4.5 | 30.5 | W 40-14 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.