A Des Moines River · District 1
Bussey Twin Cedars 1989
-36.5
Final rating
A #73 of 82
3-6
Record
8.7 for · 27.3 against
-18.7
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-28.0
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-41.7 → -36.5Schedule
Wk 1vsAMormon Trail#68W 32-21
Sep 1 · +10.0fav no cov · over
Wk 2at2AColfax-Mingo#47L 0-38
Sep 8 · +27.0fav cov · over
Wk 3at1AMonroe#59L 0-40
Sep 15 · +19.0fav cov · over
Wk 4vs2APleasantville#23L 6-43
Sep 22 · +43.0fav no cov · under
Wk 5vsAPrairie City#52L 6-27
Sep 29 · +20.5fav cov · push
Wk 6atANorth Mahaska#10L 0-41
Oct 6 · +37.5fav cov · under
Wk 7at2AEddyville#79W 28-12
Oct 13 · +5.0fav no cov · over
Wk 8vs1ALynnville-Sully#66L 0-24
Oct 20 · +18.0fav cov · under
Wk 9vsAMelcher-Dallas#51W 6-0
Oct 27 · +17.5fav no cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 1 | vs | AMormon Trail | #68 / 82 A | +10.0 | 34.0 | W 32-21 | fav no cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 8 | at | 2AColfax-Mingo | #47 / 80 2A | +27.0 | 37.0 | L 0-38 | fav cov · over report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 15 | at | 1AMonroe | #59 / 87 1A | +19.0 | 35.5 | L 0-40 | fav cov · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 22 | vs | 2APleasantville | #23 / 80 2A | +43.0 | 53.5 | L 6-43 | fav no cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 29 | vs | APrairie City | #52 / 82 A | +20.5 | 33.0 | L 6-27 | fav cov · push report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 6 | at | ANorth Mahaska | #10 / 82 A | +37.5 | 47.5 | L 0-41 | fav cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 13 | at | 2AEddyville | #79 / 80 2A | +5.0 | 36.5 | W 28-12 | fav no cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 20 | vs | 1ALynnville-Sully | #66 / 87 1A | +18.0 | 34.5 | L 0-24 | fav cov · under report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 27 | vs | AMelcher-Dallas | #51 / 82 A | +17.5 | 35.0 | W 6-0 OT | fav no cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.