A Top of Iowa · District 2
Belmond-Klemme 2025
-25.8
Final rating
A #33 of 56
3-6
Record
28.9 for · 33.1 against
-4.2
Margin / game
0-1
Playoffs
out in round 1
-14.1
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
1 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-35.6 → -25.8Schedule
Wk 1at1AClarion CGD#19L 30-44
Aug 29 · +26.5fav no cov · over
Wk 2vsAMason City Newman#26L 20-21
Sep 5 · +3.5fav no cov · under
Wk 3atAAckley AGWSR#48W 28-12
Sep 12 · -11.5fav cov · under
Wk 4vsALake Mills#52W 45-0
Sep 19 · -16.0fav cov · under
Wk 5atAConrad BCLUW#46W 46-20
Sep 26 · -9.5fav cov · over
Wk 6atASheffield West Fork#28L 32-48
Oct 3 · PKpush · over
Wk 7vsASioux Central#21L 28-66
Oct 10 · +11.5fav cov · over
Wk 8vsABritt West Hancock#9L 24-38
Oct 17 · +30.5fav no cov · over
POatAMarcus MMCRU#1L 7-49
Oct 24 · +40.0fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Aug 29 | at | 1AClarion CGD | #19 / 48 1A | +26.5 | 47.5 | L 30-44 | fav no cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 5 | vs | AMason City Newman | #26 / 56 A | +3.5 | 53.0 | L 20-21 | fav no cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 12 | at | AAckley AGWSR | #48 / 56 A | -11.5 | 49.5 | W 28-12 | fav cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 19 | vs | ALake Mills | #52 / 56 A | -16.0 | 49.0 | W 45-0 | fav cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 26 | at | AConrad BCLUW | #46 / 56 A | -9.5 | 54.5 | W 46-20 | fav cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 3 | at | ASheffield West Fork | #28 / 56 A | PK | 48.5 | L 32-48 | push · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 10 | vs | ASioux Central | #21 / 56 A | +11.5 | 51.5 | L 28-66 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 17 | vs | ABritt West Hancock | #9 / 56 A | +30.5 | 57.0 | L 24-38 | fav no cov · over report |
| PO | Fri Oct 24 | at | AMarcus MMCRU | #1 / 56 A | +40.0 | 51.5 | L 7-49 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.