A Mid-Iowa · District 1
Baxter C-M-B 1988
-8.2
Final rating
A #38 of 89
5-4
Record
21.3 for · 13.4 against
+7.9
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-13.8
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-13.6 → -8.2Schedule
Wk 1vs1ABondurant-Farrar#77L 16-24
Sep 2 · -5.5fav no cov · over
Wk 2atAThornburg Tri-County#67L 0-20
Sep 9 · -6.0fav no cov · under
Wk 3vsAHubbard-Radcliffe#57L 14-23
Sep 16 · +9.0push · over
Wk 4vsAGilman SEMCO#40W 24-0
Sep 23 · +8.5fav no cov · under
Wk 5at1AColo-NESCO#48W 28-0
Sep 30 · +13.0fav no cov · under
Wk 6vsANortheast Hamilton#80W 45-8
Oct 7 · -7.5fav cov · over
Wk 7atAAlden#25W 9-7
Oct 14 · +12.0fav no cov · under
Wk 8at1AEnglish Valleys#37L 14-27
Oct 21 · +4.0fav cov · over
Wk 9vs1AMonroe#67W 42-12
Oct 28 · -2.5fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 2 | vs | 1ABondurant-Farrar | #77 / 94 1A | -5.5 | 34.0 | L 16-24 | fav no cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 9 | at | AThornburg Tri-County | #67 / 89 A | -6.0 | 36.0 | L 0-20 | fav no cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 16 | vs | AHubbard-Radcliffe | #57 / 89 A | +9.0 | 35.0 | L 14-23 | push · over report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 23 | vs | AGilman SEMCO | #40 / 89 A | +8.5 | 32.5 | W 24-0 | fav no cov · under report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 30 | at | 1AColo-NESCO | #48 / 94 1A | +13.0 | 28.5 | W 28-0 | fav no cov · under report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 7 | vs | ANortheast Hamilton | #80 / 89 A | -7.5 | 34.0 | W 45-8 | fav cov · over report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 14 | at | AAlden | #25 / 89 A | +12.0 | 32.0 | W 9-7 | fav no cov · under report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 21 | at | 1AEnglish Valleys | #37 / 94 1A | +4.0 | 33.5 | L 14-27 | fav cov · over report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 28 | vs | 1AMonroe | #67 / 94 1A | -2.5 | 34.5 | W 42-12 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.