2A Tri-Rivers · District 1
Arlington Starmont 1988
19.4
Final rating
2A #9 of 81
7-2
Record
31.3 for · 16.8 against
+14.6
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
8.0
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
26.4 → 19.4Schedule
Wk 1at2AJesup#73W 47-6
Sep 2 · -37.5fav cov · over
Wk 2vs1AEdgewood-Colesburg#42W 27-8
Sep 9 · -28.5fav no cov · under
Wk 3at1ACenter Point-Urbana#10L 8-14
Sep 16 · -22.5fav no cov · under
Wk 4vs2AMaquoketa Valley#6L 22-55
Sep 23 · PKpush · over
Wk 5at1ASpringville#22W 31-14
Sep 30 · -11.0fav cov · over
Wk 6vs2AAlburnett#18W 22-6
Oct 7 · -1.5fav cov · under
Wk 7at1AEast Buchanan#27W 49-20
Oct 14 · -15.0fav cov · over
Wk 8vs2ANorth Linn#40W 26-14
Oct 21 · -17.0fav no cov · over
Wk 9at1ACentral City#45W 50-14
Oct 28 · -26.0fav cov · over
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 2 | at | 2AJesup | #73 / 81 2A | -37.5 | 47.5 | W 47-6 | fav cov · over report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 9 | vs | 1AEdgewood-Colesburg | #42 / 94 1A | -28.5 | 38.5 | W 27-8 | fav no cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 16 | at | 1ACenter Point-Urbana | #10 / 94 1A | -22.5 | 36.0 | L 8-14 | fav no cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 23 | vs | 2AMaquoketa Valley | #6 / 81 2A | PK | 33.5 | L 22-55 | push · over report |
| 5 | Fri Sep 30 | at | 1ASpringville | #22 / 94 1A | -11.0 | 36.0 | W 31-14 | fav cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 7 | vs | 2AAlburnett | #18 / 81 2A | -1.5 | 34.0 | W 22-6 | fav cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 14 | at | 1AEast Buchanan | #27 / 94 1A | -15.0 | 33.5 | W 49-20 | fav cov · over report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 21 | vs | 2ANorth Linn | #40 / 81 2A | -17.0 | 33.5 | W 26-14 | fav no cov · over report |
| 9 | Fri Oct 28 | at | 1ACentral City | #45 / 94 1A | -26.0 | 36.0 | W 50-14 | fav cov · over report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.