A Big Iowa · District 1
Allison-Bristow 1985
-19.1
Final rating
A #71 of 110
3-6
Record
7.6 for · 20.4 against
-12.9
Margin / game
—
Playoffs
did not qualify
-15.3
Season-only rating
prior removed
9
Games
0 playoff
Margin by week
Rating trend
-17.8 → -19.1Schedule
Wk 1vs1ACedar Falls NU#35L 0-20
Sep 6 · +6.5fav cov · under
Wk 2vs1ADysart-Geneseo#113W 14-8
Sep 13 · -5.0fav cov · under
Wk 3at1AReinbeck#58L 0-15
Sep 20 · +15.5fav no cov · under
Wk 4vs1AAplington#40L 8-39
Sep 27 · +14.5fav cov · over
Wk 5vs1AParkersburg#14L 8-43
Oct 4 · +38.0fav no cov · over
Wk 6at1AConrad BCL#16L 0-21
Oct 11 · +31.0fav no cov · under
Wk 7atAWellsburg W-SR#80W 14-0
Oct 18 · -2.5fav cov · under
Wk 8vsAGladbrook#100W 24-16
Oct 25 · -16.5fav no cov · over
Wk 9at1AClarksville#17L 0-22
Nov 1 · +31.5fav no cov · under
| Wk | Date | Opponent | Final rank | Line | Total | Result | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Fri Sep 6 | vs | 1ACedar Falls NU | #35 / 115 1A | +6.5 | 32.5 | L 0-20 | fav cov · under report |
| 2 | Fri Sep 13 | vs | 1ADysart-Geneseo | #113 / 115 1A | -5.0 | 30.5 | W 14-8 | fav cov · under report |
| 3 | Fri Sep 20 | at | 1AReinbeck | #58 / 115 1A | +15.5 | 32.5 | L 0-15 | fav no cov · under report |
| 4 | Fri Sep 27 | vs | 1AAplington | #40 / 115 1A | +14.5 | 27.5 | L 8-39 | fav cov · over report |
| 5 | Fri Oct 4 | vs | 1AParkersburg | #14 / 115 1A | +38.0 | 48.0 | L 8-43 | fav no cov · over report |
| 6 | Fri Oct 11 | at | 1AConrad BCL | #16 / 115 1A | +31.0 | 41.0 | L 0-21 | fav no cov · under report |
| 7 | Fri Oct 18 | at | AWellsburg W-SR | #80 / 110 A | -2.5 | 28.0 | W 14-0 | fav cov · under report |
| 8 | Fri Oct 25 | vs | AGladbrook | #100 / 110 A | -16.5 | 32.0 | W 24-16 | fav no cov · over report |
| 9 | Fri Nov 1 | at | 1AClarksville | #17 / 115 1A | +31.5 | 41.5 | L 0-22 | fav no cov · under report |
Lines are what the model would have published before each week, from the team's side. Opponent rank is that opponent's final power rank within its class that season. Scores come from newspaper archives and can be wrong.